Bug#248496: raise priority

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
8 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#248496: raise priority

Salvo Tomaselli-3
severity 248496 grave
thanks

Raising priority, since the game does not run at all and the package
seems completely abandoned.

If I'm right, the package will eventually just be dropped.
--
Salvo Tomaselli

"Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso Dio che ci ha dotato di
senso, ragione ed intelletto intendesse che noi ne facessimo a meno."
                -- Galileo Galilei

http://ltworf.github.io/ltworf/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#248496: raise priority

Salvo Tomaselli-3
It does not work for me, same thing as what the bugreport has, since
over 10 years…
Il giorno sab 2 giu 2018 alle ore 15:17 Markus Koschany
<[hidden email]> ha scritto:

>
> Control: severity -1 normal
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 12:18:22 +0200 Salvo Tomaselli <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > severity 248496 grave
> > thanks
> >
> > Raising priority, since the game does not run at all and the package
> > seems completely abandoned.
> >
> > If I'm right, the package will eventually just be dropped.
>
> Hello,
>
> the game works for me on amd64 and i386 in Sid. I cannot confirm that
> the game is unusable for the majority of users hence I think severity
> grave is not justified in this case.
>
> Please note that the package has been orphaned. It simply needs a new
> maintainer.
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/869291
>
> Regards,
>
> Markus
>


--
Salvo Tomaselli

"Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso Dio che ci ha dotato di
senso, ragione ed intelletto intendesse che noi ne facessimo a meno."
                -- Galileo Galilei

http://ltworf.github.io/ltworf/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#248496: raise priority

Markus Koschany-2
Am 03.06.2018 um 09:15 schrieb Salvo Tomaselli:
> It does not work for me, same thing as what the bugreport has, since
> over 10 years…

We need more information if we want to tackle the problem.

What Debian are you running? What architecture, desktop environment, X
server and graphics driver do you use? Add everything that might be
interesting to this bug report. Without those information it is very
hard to debug the problem.

Markus


signature.asc (981 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#248496: raise priority

Salvo Tomaselli-3
Debian sid, x86_64 up to date. Intel video card, not that it matters.

Il 03 Giu 2018 12:14, "Markus Koschany" <[hidden email]> ha scritto:
Am 03.06.2018 um 09:15 schrieb Salvo Tomaselli:
> It does not work for me, same thing as what the bugreport has, since
> over 10 years…

We need more information if we want to tackle the problem.

What Debian are you running? What architecture, desktop environment, X
server and graphics driver do you use? Add everything that might be
interesting to this bug report. Without those information it is very
hard to debug the problem.

Markus

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#248496: raise priority

Markus Koschany-2
Am 03.06.2018 um 13:33 schrieb Salvo Tomaselli:
> Debian sid, x86_64 up to date. Intel video card, not that it matters.

It does matter. But with such poor bug reports this issue will never be
fixed for you.


signature.asc (981 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#248496: raise priority

Salvo Tomaselli-3
Well it had been open for over 10 years with 0 activity nor request
for more details, you only woke up because I raised priority, but are
not willing to take the package, a package that for me should be
removed.
Il giorno dom 3 giu 2018 alle ore 13:34 Markus Koschany
<[hidden email]> ha scritto:
>
> Am 03.06.2018 um 13:33 schrieb Salvo Tomaselli:
> > Debian sid, x86_64 up to date. Intel video card, not that it matters.
>
> It does matter. But with such poor bug reports this issue will never be
> fixed for you.
>


--
Salvo Tomaselli

"Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso Dio che ci ha dotato di
senso, ragione ed intelletto intendesse che noi ne facessimo a meno."
                -- Galileo Galilei

http://ltworf.github.io/ltworf/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#248496: raise priority

Markus Koschany-2
Am 03.06.2018 um 13:57 schrieb Salvo Tomaselli:
> Well it had been open for over 10 years with 0 activity nor request
> for more details, you only woke up because I raised priority, but are
> not willing to take the package, a package that for me should be
> removed.

It has been working for the majority of users for the past ten years,
that's why nobody raised the severity in the past. As long as you don't
provide proper information to debug this issue nobody will be able to
help you. Just removing a package is an extremely poor solution.


signature.asc (981 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#248496: raise priority

Salvo Tomaselli-3
It does something bad with the X11 protocol, but I don't know anything
about it so I can't debug it.

I just see from strace a bunch of recvmsg(3, {msg_namelen=0}, 0)
   = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) soon after the
socket to Xorg is opened.
Il giorno dom 3 giu 2018 alle ore 14:03 Markus Koschany
<[hidden email]> ha scritto:

>
> Am 03.06.2018 um 13:57 schrieb Salvo Tomaselli:
> > Well it had been open for over 10 years with 0 activity nor request
> > for more details, you only woke up because I raised priority, but are
> > not willing to take the package, a package that for me should be
> > removed.
>
> It has been working for the majority of users for the past ten years,
> that's why nobody raised the severity in the past. As long as you don't
> provide proper information to debug this issue nobody will be able to
> help you. Just removing a package is an extremely poor solution.
>


--
Salvo Tomaselli

"Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso Dio che ci ha dotato di
senso, ragione ed intelletto intendesse che noi ne facessimo a meno."
                -- Galileo Galilei

http://ltworf.github.io/ltworf/