Bug#291684: marked as done (orinoco.c: Error -110 writing Tx descriptor to BAP)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#291684: marked as done (orinoco.c: Error -110 writing Tx descriptor to BAP)

Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:16:35 +0100
with message-id <[hidden email]>
and subject line Closing all those bug reports, as they where erroneously labeled closed-in-NMU.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2005 11:32:59 +0000
>From [hidden email] Sat Jan 22 03:32:59 2005
Return-path: <[hidden email]>
Received: from leibniz.math.fu-berlin.de (math.fu-berlin.de) [160.45.40.10]
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CsJVi-0000rB-00; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 03:32:58 -0800
Received: (qmail 9538 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2005 12:32:56 +0100
Received: from lusin.mi.fu-berlin.de (HELO mi.fu-berlin.de) (160.45.113.91)
  by leibniz.math.fu-berlin.de with SMTP; 22 Jan 2005 12:32:56 +0100
Received: (qmail 3790 invoked by uid 9804); 22 Jan 2005 12:32:56 +0100
Received: from localhost (HELO mi.fu-berlin.de) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 22 Jan 2005 12:32:54 +0100
Received: (qmail 3750 invoked by uid 9804); 22 Jan 2005 12:32:54 +0100
Received: from leibniz.math.fu-berlin.de (HELO math.fu-berlin.de) (160.45.40.10)
  by lusin.mi.fu-berlin.de with SMTP; 22 Jan 2005 12:32:54 +0100
Received: (Qmail 9498 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2005 12:32:53 +0100
Received: From telnet.mi.fu-berlin.de (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (160.45.45.10)
  by leibniz.math.fu-berlin.de with SMTP; 22 Jan 2005 12:32:53 +0100
X-Envelope-Sender: [hidden email]
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS 0.3.12pre7-L31[3756]([hidden email])
X-Remote-IP: 160.45.45.10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Georg Wittenburg <[hidden email]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[hidden email]>
Subject: orinoco.c: Error -110 writing Tx descriptor to BAP
Bcc: Georg Wittenburg <[hidden email]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:32:52 +0100
Message-Id: <[hidden email]>
Delivered-To: [hidden email]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATING,HAS_PACKAGE
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:

Package: kernel-source-2.6.10
Version: 2.6.10-4
Severity: important


Hi,

I'm seeing the "Error -110 writing Tx descriptor to BAP" bug as
described in FAQ at http://ozlabs.org/people/dgibson/dldwd/ about once
every other day. orinoco.c prints to the syslog at such a rate, that the
system becomes completely unresponsive and I have to reboot. The lspci
output for the chip is:

0000:02:0b.0 Network controller: Intersil Corporation Prism 2.5 Wavelan
chipset (rev 01)
        Subsystem: AMBIT Microsystem Corp.: Unknown device 0201
        Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV-
        VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
        Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort-
<TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
        Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 9
        Region 0: Memory at e0500000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=4K]
        Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 2
                Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA
PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold-)
                Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
                                                                               
Updating to version 0.15rc2 of the driver (which the author considers
stable but doesn't have time to submit to mainline) fixes the problem.
Including the new driver in testing is probably too much hassle, but
maybe it's worthwhile for stable.

Regards,
   Georg

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-gw1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages kernel-source-2.6.10 depends on:
ii  binutils                      2.15-5     The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  bzip2                         1.0.2-1    A high-quality block-sorting file
ii  coreutils [fileutils]         5.2.1-2    The GNU core utilities
ii  fileutils                     5.2.1-2    The GNU file management utilities

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 291684-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2006 12:18:06 +0000
>From [hidden email] Wed Jan 11 04:18:06 2006
Return-path: <[hidden email]>
Received: from smtp8.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.22.23])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EwevW-0003iX-3z
        for [hidden email]; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 04:18:06 -0800
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by mwinf0802.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5E9DE1C00225
        for <[hidden email]>; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:17:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pegasos (AStrasbourg-251-1-48-86.w82-126.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.126.221.86])
        by mwinf0802.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3AC9C1C00204;
        Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:17:35 +0100 (CET)
X-ME-UUID: [hidden email]
Received: from sven by pegasos with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Eweu9-0001um-0K; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:16:41 +0100
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:16:35 +0100
To: [hidden email], [hidden email],
        [hidden email], [hidden email],
        [hidden email], [hidden email],
        [hidden email]
Subject: Closing all those bug reports, as they where erroneously labeled closed-in-NMU.
Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Sven Luther <[hidden email]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

As subject says.

Friendly,

Sven Luther


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [hidden email]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [hidden email]