Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again

LUK ShunTim
Maximilian Attems wrote:

> severity 343686 normal
> tags 343686 moreinfo
> tags 343686 unreproducible
> stop
>
> downgrading severity as kernel-package doesn't yet build with debsums.
>
> can you please tell how you hooked debsums into your image?
> perhaps you are invoking debsums in apt's post install hook?
> or in the kernels post install hook?
>
> --
> maks
>

Hello Maks,

This is triggered when I try to use reportbug to report a kernel bug.

<quote>
stluk@t43:~/00sys/deb$ reportbug
Please enter the name of the package in which you have found a problem, or type
'other' to report a more general problem.
> linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686
*** Welcome to reportbug.  Use ? for help at prompts. ***
Using 'LUK ShunTim <[hidden email]>' as your from address.
Detected character set: ISO-8859-1
Please change your locale if this is incorrect.

Getting status for linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686...
Verifying package integrity...
There may be a problem with your installation of linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686;
the following files appear to be missing or changed:
debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file
/lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.pcimap
debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file
/lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.dep
debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file
/lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.ieee1394map
debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file
/lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.usbmap
debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file
/lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.isapnpmap
debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file
/lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.inputmap
debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file
/lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.seriomap
debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file
/lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.alias
debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 file
/lib/modules/2.6.15-rc5-686/modules.symbols
Do you still want to file a report [y|N|q|?]? q
</quote>

Regards,
ST
--


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [hidden email]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again

Maximilian Attems-3
hello luk!

On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 09:50:15PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote:
>
> This is triggered when I try to use reportbug to report a kernel bug.

ok reportbug checks if there are debsums for a packet,
currently we don't add them so i'm still curious where do you get them
from?

please post the output of
apt-cach show linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686
cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686.postint
dpkg -L linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686

maybe than we have a hint of how you got that?

regards

--
maks


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [hidden email]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again

Jonas Smedegaard
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 15:28:04 +0100
Maximilian Attems <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 09:50:15PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote:
> >
> > This is triggered when I try to use reportbug to report a kernel
> > bug.
>
> ok reportbug checks if there are debsums for a packet,
> currently we don't add them so i'm still curious where do you get them
> from?
>
> please post the output of
> apt-cach show linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686
> cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686.postint
> dpkg -L linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686
>
> maybe than we have a hint of how you got that?


The output of "debconf-show debsums" is probably more interesting.

And perhaps read the description associated with the question asked
when running "dpkg-reconfigure debsums".

I suspect this to be a non-bug...


 - Jonas

- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDu98Gn7DbMsAkQLgRAjDIAKCS+973LQFA6a1dNXvQ30QF9JpgTACfRfcX
D4VYt2m9fOmAIriFr6/sORo=
=N8S7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again

Jonas Smedegaard
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 22:55:07 +0800
LUK ShunTim <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I did *not* cc the bug list as the email is quite large, over 100k.

Please do not post me privately about non-secret bugs. I have a strong
interest in working in the open.

I understand if this can be confusing: Some get furious when you "make
too much noise" in bugreports, others (like me) when you don't.


Besides, I did not request those lengthy details - on the contrary I
suggested this to be a non-bug.

And if you were to play nice with lengthy details for bugreports you
could either compress it or put it somewhere on the web and only refer
to it with a URL.


 - Jonas

- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDvToPn7DbMsAkQLgRAr/RAKCCwg/vyGsJYxhG5Vu0pK79MUglNACgnxCy
ao5PNUFeBecfkyWspgsOxA4=
=86+S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again

LUK ShunTim
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 22:55:07 +0800
> LUK ShunTim <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
>>>I did *not* cc the bug list as the email is quite large, over 100k.
>
>
> Please do not post me privately about non-secret bugs. I have a strong
> interest in working in the open.

Hello Jonas,

As you said, there is no secret at all. :-)

>
> I understand if this can be confusing: Some get furious when you "make
> too much noise" in bugreports, others (like me) when you don't.
>
>
> Besides, I did not request those lengthy details - on the contrary I
> suggested this to be a non-bug.

Thanks for your opinion but that's something I, as an ordinary user and
reporter of (probable) bugs, not fully competent to judge.

>
> And if you were to play nice with lengthy details for bugreports you
> could either compress it or put it somewhere on the web and only refer
> to it with a URL.

I *have* thought about all these options and I've chosen this course
action which IMO is reasonable, under the current circumstances. And I'm
sure package maintainers would provide sufficient information to the bug
list after the investigation.

Your opinion is noted and this will be the last you hear (directly) from
me on this topic. Thank you for your patience and

good day,
ST
--




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [hidden email]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again

Jonas Smedegaard
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 14:22:21 +0800
LUK ShunTim <[hidden email]> wrote:

> As you said, there is no secret at all. :-)

I noticed - that's why I responded through the list.



> Your opinion is noted and this will be the last you hear (directly)
> from me on this topic. Thank you for your patience and

Just a clarification (you might have understood already :-) ): I am
quite interested in your reporting bugs. That's an important part of the
development proces. Just do in through open lists and the open BTS
rather than privately (except for the rare cases of security-related
bugs that may need special care before revealed to the public).

So thanks alot for your help :-)


 - Jonas

- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDvlBhn7DbMsAkQLgRAmkzAJ9l3dXAWKYdIniZTpC8iJ6cZAxKYQCdGs5b
vYlCgyK03XS0pFlDw/egqWk=
=yeBm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----