Bug#801071: Should this package be removed?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#801071: Should this package be removed?

Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: minirok
Severity: serious

Should minirok be removed? It hasn't seen an upload
since 2009, it's dead upstream (Debian maintainer is also
upstream), popcon usage is marginal and it relies on
obsolete gstreamer 0.10. Plus, there's plenty of alternatives
in the archive.

Please address the outstanding bugs or reassign this to
ftp.debian.org for removal.

Cheers,
        Moritz

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#801071: Should this package be removed?

Adeodato Simó-4

retitle 801071 Please remove minirok from the archive reassign 801071 ftp.debian.org stop

Hello—

I agree with Moritz: let’s remove minirok from the archive.

I’m maintainer and upstream. I don’t have intentions to work on it any further.

Thanks,

Moritz Muehlenhoff [hidden email] writes:

Package: minirok Severity: serious

Should minirok be removed? It hasn't seen an upload since 2009, it's dead upstream (Debian maintainer is also upstream), popcon usage is marginal and it relies on obsolete gstreamer 0.10. Plus, there's plenty of alternatives in the archive.

Please address the outstanding bugs or reassign this to ftp.debian.org for removal.

Cheers, Moritz