Bug#822744: transition: gloox

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#822744: transition: gloox

Vincent Cheng-2
Package: release.debian.org
User: [hidden email]
Usertags: transition
Severity: normal

Hi,

I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a relatively small
transition, with only 3 source packages affected (tested builds against newer
gloox, currently in experimental, results are as follows):

licq (FTBFS not related to gloox, #820106, pending autoremoval)
0ad (build ok, needs binNMU)
uwsgi (build ok, needs binNMU)

Ben file:

(https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gloox.html is accurate)

Regards,
Vincent

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#822744: transition: gloox

Emilio Pozuelo Monfort-4
Control: tags -1 confirmed

On 27/04/16 03:59, Vincent Cheng wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> User: [hidden email]
> Usertags: transition
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a relatively small
> transition, with only 3 source packages affected (tested builds against newer
> gloox, currently in experimental, results are as follows):
>
> licq (FTBFS not related to gloox, #820106, pending autoremoval)
> 0ad (build ok, needs binNMU)
> uwsgi (build ok, needs binNMU)

Go ahead.

Cheers,
Emilio

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Processed: Re: Bug#822744: transition: gloox

Debian Bug Tracking System
In reply to this post by Vincent Cheng-2
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #822744 [release.debian.org] transition: gloox
Added tag(s) confirmed.

--
822744: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822744
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [hidden email] with problems

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#822744: transition: gloox

Vincent Cheng-2
In reply to this post by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort-4
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:12 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 27/04/16 03:59, Vincent Cheng wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> User: [hidden email]
>> Usertags: transition
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a relatively small
>> transition, with only 3 source packages affected (tested builds against newer
>> gloox, currently in experimental, results are as follows):
>>
>> licq (FTBFS not related to gloox, #820106, pending autoremoval)
>> 0ad (build ok, needs binNMU)
>> uwsgi (build ok, needs binNMU)
>
> Go ahead.

Uploaded, built and installed on all archs. Thanks in advance for
scheduling binNMUs!

Regards,
Vincent

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#822744: marked as done (transition: gloox)

Debian Bug Tracking System
In reply to this post by Vincent Cheng-2
Your message dated Sat, 4 Jun 2016 12:07:52 +0200
with message-id <[hidden email]>
and subject line Re: Bug#822744: transition: gloox
has caused the Debian Bug report #822744,
regarding transition: gloox
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [hidden email]
immediately.)


--
822744: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822744
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [hidden email] with problems

Package: release.debian.org
User: [hidden email]
Usertags: transition
Severity: normal

Hi,

I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a relatively small
transition, with only 3 source packages affected (tested builds against newer
gloox, currently in experimental, results are as follows):

licq (FTBFS not related to gloox, #820106, pending autoremoval)
0ad (build ok, needs binNMU)
uwsgi (build ok, needs binNMU)

Ben file:

(https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gloox.html is accurate)

Regards,
Vincent

On 28/04/16 01:20, Vincent Cheng wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:12 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 27/04/16 03:59, Vincent Cheng wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> User: [hidden email]
>>> Usertags: transition
>>> Severity: normal
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a relatively small
>>> transition, with only 3 source packages affected (tested builds against newer
>>> gloox, currently in experimental, results are as follows):
>>>
>>> licq (FTBFS not related to gloox, #820106, pending autoremoval)
>>> 0ad (build ok, needs binNMU)
>>> uwsgi (build ok, needs binNMU)
>>
>> Go ahead.
>
> Uploaded, built and installed on all archs. Thanks in advance for
> scheduling binNMUs!
This is now finished.

Cheers,
Emilio