Bug#828256: caml-crush: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#828256: caml-crush: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Kurt Roeckx
Source: caml-crush
Version: 1.0.7-1
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1

Hi,

OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released.  During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build.  A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/caml-crush_1.0.7-1_amd64-20160529-1409

On https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/1.1_API_Changes you can see various of the
reasons why it might fail.  There are also updated man pages at
https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/ that should contain useful information.

There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent
snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works.

If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us.


Kurt

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#828256: caml-crush: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Thomas Calderon
Hello Kurt,

We have released Caml Crush version 1.0.8 to address this issue.
I have uploaded the new package to mentors.debian.net and will ask my sponsor to review and push it forward.

Best regards,

Thomas Calderon

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Kurt Roeckx <[hidden email]> wrote:
Source: caml-crush
Version: 1.0.7-1
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1

Hi,

OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released.  During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build.  A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/caml-crush_1.0.7-1_amd64-20160529-1409

On https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/1.1_API_Changes you can see various of the
reasons why it might fail.  There are also updated man pages at
https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/ that should contain useful information.

There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent
snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works.

If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us.


Kurt