Bug#862470: (pre-approval) unblock: lxcfs/2.0.7-1

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#862470: (pre-approval) unblock: lxcfs/2.0.7-1

Evgeni Golov-2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [hidden email]
Usertags: unblock

Dear Release Team,

As with LXC, I wonder if you would be OK with accepting the latest LXCFS
stable release into Stretch at this point in time.
The patch is not as huge (7 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 61
deletions(-)) and the reasoning is very much the same: having the best
possible base for Stretch.

Full debdiff attached.

Thanks for all your work!
Evgeni

lxcfs_2.0.7-1.debdiff (14K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#862470: (pre-approval) unblock: lxcfs/2.0.7-1

Niels Thykier
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo

Evgeni Golov:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: [hidden email]
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> As with LXC, I wonder if you would be OK with accepting the latest LXCFS
> stable release into Stretch at this point in time.
> The patch is not as huge (7 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 61
> deletions(-)) and the reasoning is very much the same: having the best
> possible base for Stretch.
>
> Full debdiff attached.
>
> Thanks for all your work!
> Evgeni
>


Ack, please go ahead.

Thanks,
~Niels

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#862470: (pre-approval) unblock: lxcfs/2.0.7-1

Evgeni Golov-2
> > As with LXC, I wonder if you would be OK with accepting the latest LXCFS
> > stable release into Stretch at this point in time.
> > The patch is not as huge (7 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 61
> > deletions(-)) and the reasoning is very much the same: having the best
> > possible base for Stretch.
>
> Ack, please go ahead.

Thanks Niels!
Uploaded and built on all release arches.

Cheers
Evgeni