Bug#923749: fannj: FTBFS in buster/sid

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#923749: fannj: FTBFS in buster/sid

Andreas Tille-5
Hi again,

Daniel, if I do not hear from you I assume you agree that I inject
fannj into Debian Science Git and do a team upload.

Kind regards

      Andreas.

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 03:08:17PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:

> Hi,
>
> as far as I understood the Debian Java team agreed that droping the
> documentation is an appropriate way to deal with errors like this:
>
> Creating destination directory: "debian/_jh_build.javadoc/api/"
> javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module, but the packages defined in /usr/share/doc/default-jdk-doc/api/ are in named modules.
> javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module, but the packages defined in /usr/share/doc/default-jre-headless/api/ are in named modules.
> javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module, but the packages defined in /usr/share/doc/default-jdk-doc/api/ are in named modules.
>
>
> Do you have any recommendation what is the most simple way to do so for
> this package to fit the freeze policy (for sure a fix for the issue
> would be helpful as well).
>
> Kind regards
>
>        Andreas.
>
> PS: Daniel, packages touching the topic of neural networks are also
> maintained in Debian Science team.  You might like to consider
> joining this team and maintain fannj there.  Maintaining this package
> in Debian Java team is an alternative as well.  I'd strongly recommend
> to do so to maintain the package in a repository on salsa.debian.org
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>

--
http://fam-tille.de

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#923749: fannj: FTBFS in buster/sid

Andreas Tille-5
Hi,

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 03:35:58PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Daniel, if I do not hear from you I assume you agree that I inject
> fannj into Debian Science Git and do a team upload.

As I said I assumed agreement and have moved fannj to Salsa[1].
Unfortunately the build is not only failing for the docs when I try to
build it is just doing nothing in override_jh_build.

I'd appreciate any helpful hint from the Java team to finalise
a fix for this package.

Kind regards

       Andreas.

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/fannj

--
http://fam-tille.de

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#923749: Is anybody able to reproduce this issue (help urgently needed) (Was: Potential bug in jh_build (Was: fannj: FTBFS in buster/sid))

Gilles Filippini-2
Hi Andreas,

Le 2019-04-23 15:59, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi folks,
>
> may be its a busy time right now but I'd like to salvage fannj and as I
> wrote last week I suspect there might be an issue in jh_build that used
> to build a proper JAR before but stoped doing so.  Is anybody able to
> reproduce that issue or is it just me?

Yes I can reproduce this bug. It is the very same I had for mac-widgets
[1], and was said to be a Java toolchain bug [2] but not reported
IFAICT.
You can workaround this by not linking default-jdk-doc during the
jh_build step. I.e. you can drop the override_jh_build rule.

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919803
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919803#42

Regards,

_g.