Bug#925505: RFS: dhcpoptinj/0.4.4-1 [ITP]

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#925505: RFS: dhcpoptinj/0.4.4-1 [ITP]

Andreas Misje
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dhcpoptinj"

 Package name    : dhcpoptinj
 Version         : 0.4.4-1
 Upstream Author : Andreas Misje <[hidden email]>
 URL             : https://github.com/misje/dhcpoptinj
 License         : GPL-3
 Section         : net

It builds those binary packages:

  dhcpoptinj - DHCP option injector

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/dhcpoptinj


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dhcpoptinj/dhcpoptinj_0.4.4-1.dsc

More information about dhcpoptinj can be obtained from
https://github.com/misje/dhcpoptinj

Changes since the last upload:

Initial release. Closes: #923605


Best regards
--
Andreas Misje

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#925505: closed by Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> (Re: Bug#925505: RFS: dhcpoptinj/0.4.4-1 [ITP])

Andreas Misje
> I have not tested the functionality, but the packaging seems sound.
>
> In NEW.

Thanks a lot for having a look!

Out of curiosity, why did you upload one of the older revisions
uploaded to https://mentors.debian.net/package/dhcpoptinj and not the
newest, in which I have fixed a few issues, like outdated standards
version and debian-compat, and updated the VCS URIs?

If you are considering uploading another version, would you mind if I
package 0.5.0 first? Thanks again for taking the time to help me.


Best regards,
--
Andreas Misje

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#925505: closed by Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> (Re: Bug#925505: RFS: dhcpoptinj/0.4.4-1 [ITP])

Adam Borowski-3
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:38:40AM +0000, Andreas Misje wrote:
> Out of curiosity, why did you upload one of the older revisions
> uploaded to https://mentors.debian.net/package/dhcpoptinj and not the
> newest, in which I have fixed a few issues, like outdated standards
> version and debian-compat, and updated the VCS URIs?

I had grabbed the package earlier, and did not suspect there might be
updates since the last post.

> If you are considering uploading another version, would you mind if I
> package 0.5.0 first?

While I'm obviously willing to upload new versions in the future, it's
usually harmful to have multiple versions in NEW -- the ftpmasters would
have to review them all, and failure in just one means rejection of
everything.

Thus, I'd recommend waiting for 0.4.4-1 to get ACCEPTed or REJECTed, and
only then updating it.


Meow!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Did ya know that typing "test -j8" instead of "ctest -j8"
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ will make your testsuite pass much faster, and fix bugs?
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀