Bug#930676: goplay: Should this package be removed?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#930676: goplay: Should this package be removed?

Julian Andres Klode-4
Package: goplay
Severity: serious

Hi folks,

goplay has not received any updates since 2015, it uses libept,
which we'd like to get rid of eventually I think, as it's also
unmaintained, so I think it would be best to remove it.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers eoan
  APT policy: (991, 'eoan'), (500, 'eoan'), (500, 'cosmic-security')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.0.0-15-generic (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C.UTF-8), LANGUAGE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages goplay depends on:
ii  apt-xapian-index   0.47ubuntu13
pn  debtags | debtags  <none>
ii  libc6              2.29-0ubuntu2
ii  libcurl3-gnutls    7.64.0-3ubuntu2
ii  libept1.5.0        1.1+nmu3build1
pn  libept1.5.90       <none>
ii  libfltk-images1.3  1.3.4-9ubuntu1
ii  libfltk1.3         1.3.4-9ubuntu1
ii  libgcc1            1:9.1.0-4ubuntu1
ii  libstdc++6         9.1.0-4ubuntu1
ii  libxapian30        1.4.11-1

Versions of packages goplay recommends:
pn  games-thumbnails  <none>

goplay suggests no packages.

--
debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev
ubuntu core developer                              i speak de, en

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#930676: goplay: Should this package be removed?

Markus Koschany-2
Hello,

On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:46:30 +0200 Julian Andres Klode <[hidden email]>
wrote:
> Package: goplay
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi folks,
>
> goplay has not received any updates since 2015, it uses libept,
> which we'd like to get rid of eventually I think, as it's also
> unmaintained, so I think it would be best to remove it.

I agree with you in general. However, IMHO, can we defer this decision
to buster +1 or is this really imminent. AFAIK the package works for Buster?

Regards,

Markus


signature.asc (981 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#930676: goplay: Should this package be removed?

Julian Andres Klode-4
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 03:17:41AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:

> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:46:30 +0200 Julian Andres Klode <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > Package: goplay
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > goplay has not received any updates since 2015, it uses libept,
> > which we'd like to get rid of eventually I think, as it's also
> > unmaintained, so I think it would be best to remove it.
>
> I agree with you in general. However, IMHO, can we defer this decision
> to buster +1 or is this really imminent. AFAIK the package works for Buster?
Sure, we can defer this until after the release.


--
debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev
ubuntu core developer                              i speak de, en

signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug#930676: goplay: Should this package be removed?

Miriam Ruiz-4
In reply to this post by Julian Andres Klode-4
> goplay has not received any updates since 2015, it uses libept,
> which we'd like to get rid of eventually I think, as it's also
> unmaintained, so I think it would be best to remove it.

I agree. I think it should be removed.

Miry