Re: fannj: FTBFS in buster/sid

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
8 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: fannj: FTBFS in buster/sid

Andreas Tille-5
Hi,

as far as I understood the Debian Java team agreed that droping the
documentation is an appropriate way to deal with errors like this:

Creating destination directory: "debian/_jh_build.javadoc/api/"
javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module, but the packages defined in /usr/share/doc/default-jdk-doc/api/ are in named modules.
javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module, but the packages defined in /usr/share/doc/default-jre-headless/api/ are in named modules.
javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module, but the packages defined in /usr/share/doc/default-jdk-doc/api/ are in named modules.


Do you have any recommendation what is the most simple way to do so for
this package to fit the freeze policy (for sure a fix for the issue
would be helpful as well).

Kind regards

       Andreas.

PS: Daniel, packages touching the topic of neural networks are also
maintained in Debian Science team.  You might like to consider
joining this team and maintain fannj there.  Maintaining this package
in Debian Java team is an alternative as well.  I'd strongly recommend
to do so to maintain the package in a repository on salsa.debian.org

--
http://fam-tille.de

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: fannj: FTBFS in buster/sid

Andreas Tille-5
Hi again,

Daniel, if I do not hear from you I assume you agree that I inject
fannj into Debian Science Git and do a team upload.

Kind regards

      Andreas.

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 03:08:17PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:

> Hi,
>
> as far as I understood the Debian Java team agreed that droping the
> documentation is an appropriate way to deal with errors like this:
>
> Creating destination directory: "debian/_jh_build.javadoc/api/"
> javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module, but the packages defined in /usr/share/doc/default-jdk-doc/api/ are in named modules.
> javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module, but the packages defined in /usr/share/doc/default-jre-headless/api/ are in named modules.
> javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module, but the packages defined in /usr/share/doc/default-jdk-doc/api/ are in named modules.
>
>
> Do you have any recommendation what is the most simple way to do so for
> this package to fit the freeze policy (for sure a fix for the issue
> would be helpful as well).
>
> Kind regards
>
>        Andreas.
>
> PS: Daniel, packages touching the topic of neural networks are also
> maintained in Debian Science team.  You might like to consider
> joining this team and maintain fannj there.  Maintaining this package
> in Debian Java team is an alternative as well.  I'd strongly recommend
> to do so to maintain the package in a repository on salsa.debian.org
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>

--
http://fam-tille.de

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: fannj: FTBFS in buster/sid

Andreas Tille-5
Hi,

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 03:35:58PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Daniel, if I do not hear from you I assume you agree that I inject
> fannj into Debian Science Git and do a team upload.

As I said I assumed agreement and have moved fannj to Salsa[1].
Unfortunately the build is not only failing for the docs when I try to
build it is just doing nothing in override_jh_build.

I'd appreciate any helpful hint from the Java team to finalise
a fix for this package.

Kind regards

       Andreas.

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/fannj

--
http://fam-tille.de

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Potential bug in jh_build (Was: fannj: FTBFS in buster/sid)

Andreas Tille-5
Hi,

I'd like to make some noise again about this issue.  I'm concerned
about the fact that

    jh_build --javadoc-opts='-link /usr/share/doc/default-jdk-doc/api'

was creating a JAR file until some point in time but it does not
any more.  Is this a bug in jh_build?

Kind regards

      Andreas.

On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 01:36:18PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 03:35:58PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Daniel, if I do not hear from you I assume you agree that I inject
> > fannj into Debian Science Git and do a team upload.
>
> As I said I assumed agreement and have moved fannj to Salsa[1].
> Unfortunately the build is not only failing for the docs when I try to
> build it is just doing nothing in override_jh_build.
>
> I'd appreciate any helpful hint from the Java team to finalise
> a fix for this package.
>
> Kind regards
>
>        Andreas.
>
> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/fannj
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>

--
http://fam-tille.de

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Is anybody able to reproduce this issue (help urgently needed) (Was: Potential bug in jh_build (Was: fannj: FTBFS in buster/sid))

Andreas Tille-5
Hi folks,

may be its a busy time right now but I'd like to salvage fannj and as I
wrote last week I suspect there might be an issue in jh_build that used
to build a proper JAR before but stoped doing so.  Is anybody able to
reproduce that issue or is it just me?

Kind regards

      Andreas.

On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:21:46AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'd like to make some noise again about this issue.  I'm concerned
> about the fact that
>
>     jh_build --javadoc-opts='-link /usr/share/doc/default-jdk-doc/api'
>
> was creating a JAR file until some point in time but it does not
> any more.  Is this a bug in jh_build?
>
> Kind regards
>
>       Andreas.
>
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 01:36:18PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 03:35:58PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > Daniel, if I do not hear from you I assume you agree that I inject
> > > fannj into Debian Science Git and do a team upload.
> >
> > As I said I assumed agreement and have moved fannj to Salsa[1].
> > Unfortunately the build is not only failing for the docs when I try to
> > build it is just doing nothing in override_jh_build.
> >
> > I'd appreciate any helpful hint from the Java team to finalise
> > a fix for this package.
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> >        Andreas.
> >
> > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/fannj
> >
> > --
> > http://fam-tille.de
> >
> >
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>

--
http://fam-tille.de

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Bug#923749: Is anybody able to reproduce this issue (help urgently needed) (Was: Potential bug in jh_build (Was: fannj: FTBFS in buster/sid))

Santiago Vila
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 03:59:58PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:

> may be its a busy time right now but I'd like to salvage fannj and as I
> wrote last week I suspect there might be an issue in jh_build that used
> to build a proper JAR before but stoped doing so.  Is anybody able to
> reproduce that issue or is it just me?

There was a bug in javatools which was fixed by Niels a few days ago:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=927676

Could it be related?

(I'm going to build fannj again in sid to find out)
(I've also just retriggered rebuilds in reproducible-builds)

Thanks.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Bug#923749: Is anybody able to reproduce this issue (help urgently needed) (Was: Potential bug in jh_build (Was: fannj: FTBFS in buster/sid))

Santiago Vila
In reply to this post by Andreas Tille-5
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 03:59:58PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:

> may be its a busy time right now but I'd like to salvage fannj and as I
> wrote last week I suspect there might be an issue in jh_build that used
> to build a proper JAR before but stoped doing so.  Is anybody able to
> reproduce that issue or is it just me?

The FTBFS still happens in both my autobuilders and
reproducible-builds in sid.

I also believe it is an issue in jh_build, as I have a successful
build in 2019-01-10 and a failed build in 2019-01-21 for the same
version of fannj.

If this is one of those weird bugs which only happen in
reproducible-builds and/or my autobuilders, please contact me
privately and I will gladly offer ssh access to a test machine.

Thanks.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Is anybody able to reproduce this issue (help urgently needed) (Was: Potential bug in jh_build (Was: fannj: FTBFS in buster/sid))

Gilles Filippini-2
In reply to this post by Andreas Tille-5
Hi Andreas,

Le 2019-04-23 15:59, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Hi folks,
>
> may be its a busy time right now but I'd like to salvage fannj and as I
> wrote last week I suspect there might be an issue in jh_build that used
> to build a proper JAR before but stoped doing so.  Is anybody able to
> reproduce that issue or is it just me?

Yes I can reproduce this bug. It is the very same I had for mac-widgets
[1], and was said to be a Java toolchain bug [2] but not reported
IFAICT.
You can workaround this by not linking default-jdk-doc during the
jh_build step. I.e. you can drop the override_jh_build rule.

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919803
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919803#42

Regards,

_g.