[balint@balintreczey.hu: Accepted xbmc 2:13.2+dfsg1-2~exp0 (source all amd64) into experimental

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[balint@balintreczey.hu: Accepted xbmc 2:13.2+dfsg1-2~exp0 (source all amd64) into experimental

David Weinehall
The latest upload of xbmc seems a bit botched; this is the
changelog in its entirety:


 xbmc (2:13.2+dfsg1-2~exp0) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
 .
   *

Now, there is nothing wrong with terse and succinct changelogs,
but I'd say this is a bit *too* terse, and not at all succinct.

Also, should the builders even accept packages that has an invalid
distribution specified (in the most recent changelog entry, that is)?

Filtering out "UNRELEASED" and packages with an empty changelog would
prevent at least some premature uploads.


Kind regards, David Weinehall
--
 /) David Weinehall <[hidden email]> /) Rime on my window           (\
//  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   //  Diamond-white roses of fire //
\)  http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/    (/   Beautiful hoar-frost       (/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [hidden email]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [hidden email]
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140930113553.GA8499@...

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [balint@balintreczey.hu: Accepted xbmc 2:13.2+dfsg1-2~exp0 (source all amd64) into experimental

Cyril Brulebois-4
David Weinehall <[hidden email]> (2014-09-30):

> The latest upload of xbmc seems a bit botched; this is the
> changelog in its entirety:
>
>
>  xbmc (2:13.2+dfsg1-2~exp0) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
>  .
>    *
>
> Now, there is nothing wrong with terse and succinct changelogs,
> but I'd say this is a bit *too* terse, and not at all succinct.
>
> Also, should the builders even accept packages that has an invalid
> distribution specified (in the most recent changelog entry, that is)?
>
> Filtering out "UNRELEASED" and packages with an empty changelog would
> prevent at least some premature uploads.
What's in changelog doesn't actually matter; see changes file instead.

You might be interested in things like this:
  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542747

Mraw,
KiBi.

signature.asc (853 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [balint@balintreczey.hu: Accepted xbmc 2:13.2+dfsg1-2~exp0 (source all amd64) into experimental

Jakub Wilk-4
* Cyril Brulebois <[hidden email]>, 2014-09-30, 13:43:
>You might be interested in things like this:
>  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542747

I've also filed #763457.

--
Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [hidden email]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [hidden email]
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140930123919.GA2380@...

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [balint@balintreczey.hu: Accepted xbmc 2:13.2+dfsg1-2~exp0 (source all amd64) into experimental

Bálint Réczey
In reply to this post by David Weinehall
Hi David,

2014-09-30 13:35 GMT+02:00 David Weinehall <[hidden email]>:

> The latest upload of xbmc seems a bit botched; this is the
> changelog in its entirety:
>
>
>  xbmc (2:13.2+dfsg1-2~exp0) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
>  .
>    *
>
> Now, there is nothing wrong with terse and succinct changelogs,
> but I'd say this is a bit *too* terse, and not at all succinct.
:-)
Thanks for pointing this out. I'll upload a fixed version soon.
Luckily the content of the package content was OK, I just forgot about
the last update to the changelog.

>
> Also, should the builders even accept packages that has an invalid
> distribution specified (in the most recent changelog entry, that is)?
I think rejecting those during upload would be a good idea.

Cheers,
Balint

>
> Filtering out "UNRELEASED" and packages with an empty changelog would
> prevent at least some premature uploads.
>
>
> Kind regards, David Weinehall
> --
>  /) David Weinehall <[hidden email]> /) Rime on my window           (\
> //  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   //  Diamond-white roses of fire //
> \)  http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/    (/   Beautiful hoar-frost       (/
>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [hidden email]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [hidden email]
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAK0OdpzHzU3vAhHjoXLS-qiz0-SfMwcwMFi5O8HJJxaBgBNE=w@...