[frankie@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
12 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[frankie@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]

Francesco P. Lovergine-4
Just a gently polling.

Most of the packages still need a rebuild, but maybe python transition has
major priority...

----- Forwarded message from "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[hidden email]> -----

Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:28:09 +0100
From: "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 04:42:50PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> Hi RMs
>
> Long due migration to 1.8.4 has been started (pending in NEW). That will
> require a binNMU for all depedent packages. Thanks.
>

This is the list of the packages that buil-dep on hdf5 and require a binNMU:
(build-dep on libhdf5-serial-dev|libhdf5-openmpi-dev|libhdf5-mpich-dev|libhdf5-lam-dev)

yorick-hdf5  
udav  
jhdf  
gpiv  
scilab  
magics++  
gnudatalanguage  
pytables  
pygpiv  
paraview  
h5py  
mpb  
gpivtools  
octave3.2  
mathgl  
libfvm  
grads  
tessa  
h5utils  
labplot  
meep  
octave3.0  
med-fichier  
gdal  
libgpiv  
hdf-eos5  
r-cran-hdf5  
cdo  
ecs  
libcgns  
minc

--
Francesco P. Lovergine

----- End forwarded message -----

--
Francesco P. Lovergine


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [hidden email]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [frankie@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]

Thomas Weber-8
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:25:00AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:

> Just a gently polling.
>
> Most of the packages still need a rebuild, but maybe python transition has
> major priority...
>
> ----- Forwarded message from "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[hidden email]> -----
>
> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:28:09 +0100
> From: "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 04:42:50PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > Hi RMs
> >
> > Long due migration to 1.8.4 has been started (pending in NEW). That will
> > require a binNMU for all depedent packages. Thanks.
> >
>
> This is the list of the packages that buil-dep on hdf5 and require a binNMU:
> (build-dep on libhdf5-serial-dev|libhdf5-openmpi-dev|libhdf5-mpich-dev|libhdf5-lam-dev)
>
> octave3.2  
Upstream has released a new release of octave (3.2.4). Unless the
release team objects, I intend to upload it tomorrow.

        Thomas


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [hidden email]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [frankie@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]

Salvatore Bonaccorso-3
In reply to this post by Francesco P. Lovergine-4
Hi all

On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:25:00AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> Just a gently polling.
>
> Most of the packages still need a rebuild, but maybe python transition has
> major priority...

What is the status about this? Should individual binNMU be requested? (@RMs)

Bests
Salvatore

signature.asc (852 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [frankie@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]

Adam D. Barratt
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote, Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:41 +0100:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:25:00AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > Just a gently polling.
> >
> > Most of the packages still need a rebuild, but maybe python transition
> > has
> > major priority...
>
> What is the status about this? Should individual binNMU be requested?
> (@RMs)

binNMUs were scheduled earlier today.

See http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/02/msg00234.html and the
follow-up.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [hidden email]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [hidden email]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/A1BFF86CEF704B7C9DEEA80C329F79CD@...

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [frankie@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]

Francesco P. Lovergine-4
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:45:36PM -0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote, Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:41 +0100:
> >On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:25:00AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> >> Just a gently polling.
> >>
> >> Most of the packages still need a rebuild, but maybe python
> >transition > has
> >> major priority...
> >
> >What is the status about this? Should individual binNMU be
> >requested? (@RMs)
>
> binNMUs were scheduled earlier today.
>
> See http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/02/msg00234.html and
> the follow-up.
>

Note that octave is not the only build-rdep. If you prefer so, I would
fill in a complete set of binNMU snippets updated to today.

--
Francesco P. Lovergine


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [hidden email]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [hidden email]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100222191903.GA2403@...

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [frankie@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]

Thomas Weber-8
In reply to this post by Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:45:36PM -0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote, Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:41 +0100:
>> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:25:00AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
>> > Just a gently polling.
>> >
>> > Most of the packages still need a rebuild, but maybe python
>> transition > has
>> > major priority...
>>
>> What is the status about this? Should individual binNMU be requested?  
>> (@RMs)
>
> binNMUs were scheduled earlier today.
>
> See http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/02/msg00234.html and the  
> follow-up.

That's not enough. I only looked for octave-related packages that didn't
have hdf5 as build-dependencies (hdf5 is pulled in by Octave).

Sorry, but I didn't want to touch other maintainer's ground.

        Thomas


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [hidden email]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [hidden email]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100222210043.GA6870@atlan

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [frankie@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]

Adam D. Barratt
In reply to this post by Francesco P. Lovergine-4
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 20:19 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:45:36PM -0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote, Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:41 +0100:
> > >What is the status about this? Should individual binNMU be
> > >requested? (@RMs)
> >
> > binNMUs were scheduled earlier today.
> >
> > See http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/02/msg00234.html and
> > the follow-up.
> >
>
> Note that octave is not the only build-rdep. If you prefer so, I would
> fill in a complete set of binNMU snippets updated to today.

Yes, please.

Cheers,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [hidden email]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [hidden email]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1266873136.8296.1052.camel@...

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [frankie@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]

Salvatore Bonaccorso-3
In reply to this post by Francesco P. Lovergine-4
Hi all

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 08:19:03PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:45:36PM -0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote, Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:41 +0100:
> > >On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:25:00AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > >> Just a gently polling.
> > >>
> > >> Most of the packages still need a rebuild, but maybe python
> > >transition > has
> > >> major priority...
> > >
> > >What is the status about this? Should individual binNMU be
> > >requested? (@RMs)
> >
> > binNMUs were scheduled earlier today.
> >
> > See http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/02/msg00234.html and
> > the follow-up.
> >
>
> Note that octave is not the only build-rdep. If you prefer so, I would
> fill in a complete set of binNMU snippets updated to today.
Sorry for my 'unclear' question. This was indeed that what I wanted to
ask, if each maintainer is asked to to a separate binNMU request, or
if it will be done in 'a row'.

Thanks Franceso, if you will do it!

Bests
Salvatore

signature.asc (852 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [frankie@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]

Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt-3
In reply to this post by Adam D. Barratt
"Adam D. Barratt" <[hidden email]> writes:

> On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 20:19 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:45:36PM -0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote, Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:41 +0100:
>> > >What is the status about this? Should individual binNMU be
>> > >requested? (@RMs)
>> > binNMUs were scheduled earlier today.
>> >
>> > See http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/02/msg00234.html and
>> > the follow-up.
>> Note that octave is not the only build-rdep. If you prefer so, I would
>> fill in a complete set of binNMU snippets updated to today.
> Yes, please.
I've now constructed my own list and scheduled the following binNMUs:
nmu 1 yorick-hdf5_0.8.0-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
nmu 2 udav_0.5.2-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips ia64 kfreebsd-i386 amd64 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
nmu 1 udav_0.5.2-1 . s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel sparc armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
nmu 2 plplot_5.9.2-3 . kfreebsd-amd64 s390 alpha hppa kfreebsd-i386 powerpc sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
nmu 2 h5py_1.2.1-2 . mips mipsel sparc . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
nmu 2 pygpiv_2.0.0-1 . mips . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
nmu 1 mpb_1.4.2-14 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
nmu 4 tessa_0.3.1-4 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
nmu 1 octave3.0_1:3.0.5-7 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
nmu 1 libgpiv_0.6.1-3 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
nmu 1 hdf-eos5_5.1.12.dfsg.2-2 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
nmu 3 minc_2.0.18-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
nmu 1 octave-optim_1.0.6-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
nmu 2 pytables_2.1.2-3 . mips mipsel sparc . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
nmu 1 mathgl_1.9-2 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
nmu 1 pfstools_1.8.1-1.1 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
nmu 2 labplot_1.6.0.2-3 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
nmu 1 meep_1.1.1-3 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
nmu 1 r-cran-hdf5_1.6.9-2 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"

Let's see what breaks.

Marc
--
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
143: bps
       Beats Per Second. (Felix Deutsch)

attachment0 (203 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [frankie@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]

Francesco P. Lovergine-4
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:34:25PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:

> "Adam D. Barratt" <[hidden email]> writes:
> > On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 20:19 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:45:36PM -0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >> > Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote, Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:41 +0100:
> >> > >What is the status about this? Should individual binNMU be
> >> > >requested? (@RMs)
> >> > binNMUs were scheduled earlier today.
> >> >
> >> > See http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/02/msg00234.html and
> >> > the follow-up.
> >> Note that octave is not the only build-rdep. If you prefer so, I would
> >> fill in a complete set of binNMU snippets updated to today.
> > Yes, please.
>
> I've now constructed my own list and scheduled the following binNMUs:
> nmu 1 yorick-hdf5_0.8.0-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
> nmu 2 udav_0.5.2-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips ia64 kfreebsd-i386 amd64 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
> nmu 1 udav_0.5.2-1 . s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel sparc armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
> nmu 2 plplot_5.9.2-3 . kfreebsd-amd64 s390 alpha hppa kfreebsd-i386 powerpc sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
> nmu 2 h5py_1.2.1-2 . mips mipsel sparc . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
> nmu 2 pygpiv_2.0.0-1 . mips . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
> nmu 1 mpb_1.4.2-14 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
> nmu 4 tessa_0.3.1-4 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
> nmu 1 octave3.0_1:3.0.5-7 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
> nmu 1 libgpiv_0.6.1-3 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
> nmu 1 hdf-eos5_5.1.12.dfsg.2-2 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
> nmu 3 minc_2.0.18-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
> nmu 1 octave-optim_1.0.6-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
> nmu 2 pytables_2.1.2-3 . mips mipsel sparc . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
> nmu 1 mathgl_1.9-2 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
> nmu 1 pfstools_1.8.1-1.1 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
> nmu 2 labplot_1.6.0.2-3 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
> nmu 1 meep_1.1.1-3 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
> nmu 1 r-cran-hdf5_1.6.9-2 . kfreebsd-amd64 mips s390 alpha hppa powerpc mipsel ia64 kfreebsd-i386 sparc amd64 armel i386 . -m "Rebuild against new hdf5"
>

AFAIK there are still missings:

gnudatalanguage                                                                                                                                              
mpb                                                                                                                                                          
gpivtools (apparently pre-depends on libgpiv?)                                                                                                                                                  
h5utils                                                                                                                                                      

--
Francesco P. Lovergine


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [hidden email]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [hidden email]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100223115825.GC9248@...

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [frankie@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]

Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt-3
"Francesco P. Lovergine" <[hidden email]> writes:
[hdf5 binNMUs]
> AFAIK there are still missings:
>
> gnudatalanguage

No idea how I forgot that. Done now.

> mpb                              

Was in the list, already done :)

> gpivtools (apparently pre-depends on libgpiv?)

I don't see where it has a dep on something provided by hdf5?

> h5utils

As gnudatalanguage, forgotten. Probably used a broken regex. Also done
now.

Marc
--
BOFH #132:
SCSI Chain overterminated

attachment0 (203 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [frankie@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]

Francesco P. Lovergine-4
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 01:06:59PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>
> > gpivtools (apparently pre-depends on libgpiv?)
>
> I don't see where it has a dep on something provided by hdf5?
>

Sorry my mistake.

--
Francesco P. Lovergine


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [hidden email]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [hidden email]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100223121105.GD9248@...