khard_0.16.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
10 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

khard_0.16.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Debian FTP Masters


Accepted:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:05:57 +0200
Source: khard
Architecture: source
Version: 0.16.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Python Team <[hidden email]>
Changed-By: Félix Sipma <[hidden email]>
Closes: 942416
Changes:
 khard (0.16.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream version 0.16.1 (Closes: #942416)
   * move the package to Debian Python Team
   * update B-D, add:
     - python3-sphinx-autodoc-typehints
     - python3-sphinx-autoapi
     - python3-astroids
   * docs: remove AUTHORS file
   * khard.examples: remove misc/khard
   * khard.doc-base: update index path
   * update patches
   * bump Standards-Version to 4.5.0
Checksums-Sha1:
 5d118c0de53fbf531bb6c64e945afc9aa2ff5479 1680 khard_0.16.1-1.dsc
 236c06ad9c4ef2629617772cdccf4dd55546b86b 577538 khard_0.16.1.orig.tar.gz
 4da10c05179540344d6a55d0b03d877cc7ae008f 4964 khard_0.16.1-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 99436155dda2dcb5b00e3eedac729f9c2bbaa5b27a181f05a7b303dfa1849d81 1680 khard_0.16.1-1.dsc
 9a50273bc827da99afc4dc8840be02dc37a22c2bfc88a04ed348f60389f14f2e 577538 khard_0.16.1.orig.tar.gz
 b2b8d00529cf4affcf74433b02728d25496802f65e3f4c0dc7ac0eaa7d26ad38 4964 khard_0.16.1-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 b2f4d2430201b15533daef4ccaded2e8 1680 utils optional khard_0.16.1-1.dsc
 2d17f791b46ae6fb26ee820495084363 577538 utils optional khard_0.16.1.orig.tar.gz
 513a09f3e14f73b8d8e72a35876e216d 4964 utils optional khard_0.16.1-1.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQR6zeIsS8L0XLQfqiQBpfxHUdFE8AUCXqG/4QAKCRABpfxHUdFE
8Kz0AP9bV/BlefuTLkF/Voj+lPLTxFJkfDszr0No/UCfmle7HAEAvAmbhESrLtCS
t1WtFBITZJmYC0m7BMGC2i4Mc3+H+QY=
=nBwe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: khard_0.16.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Sandro Tosi-6
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 12:51 PM Debian FTP Masters
<[hidden email]> wrote:

>
>
>
> Accepted:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Format: 1.8
> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:05:57 +0200
> Source: khard
> Architecture: source
> Version: 0.16.1-1
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: medium
> Maintainer: Debian Python Team <[hidden email]>

this is not the right team and/or email address

since it's in PAPT you need to use :"Python Applications Packaging
Team <[hidden email]>"

please fix this package and todoman (and any other you may be working
on that had the same issue)

> Changed-By: Félix Sipma <[hidden email]>
> Closes: 942416
> Changes:
>  khard (0.16.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>  .
>    * New upstream version 0.16.1 (Closes: #942416)
>    * move the package to Debian Python Team
>    * update B-D, add:
>      - python3-sphinx-autodoc-typehints
>      - python3-sphinx-autoapi
>      - python3-astroids
>    * docs: remove AUTHORS file
>    * khard.examples: remove misc/khard
>    * khard.doc-base: update index path
>    * update patches
>    * bump Standards-Version to 4.5.0
> Checksums-Sha1:
>  5d118c0de53fbf531bb6c64e945afc9aa2ff5479 1680 khard_0.16.1-1.dsc
>  236c06ad9c4ef2629617772cdccf4dd55546b86b 577538 khard_0.16.1.orig.tar.gz
>  4da10c05179540344d6a55d0b03d877cc7ae008f 4964 khard_0.16.1-1.debian.tar.xz
> Checksums-Sha256:
>  99436155dda2dcb5b00e3eedac729f9c2bbaa5b27a181f05a7b303dfa1849d81 1680 khard_0.16.1-1.dsc
>  9a50273bc827da99afc4dc8840be02dc37a22c2bfc88a04ed348f60389f14f2e 577538 khard_0.16.1.orig.tar.gz
>  b2b8d00529cf4affcf74433b02728d25496802f65e3f4c0dc7ac0eaa7d26ad38 4964 khard_0.16.1-1.debian.tar.xz
> Files:
>  b2f4d2430201b15533daef4ccaded2e8 1680 utils optional khard_0.16.1-1.dsc
>  2d17f791b46ae6fb26ee820495084363 577538 utils optional khard_0.16.1.orig.tar.gz
>  513a09f3e14f73b8d8e72a35876e216d 4964 utils optional khard_0.16.1-1.debian.tar.xz
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iHUEARYKAB0WIQR6zeIsS8L0XLQfqiQBpfxHUdFE8AUCXqG/4QAKCRABpfxHUdFE
> 8Kz0AP9bV/BlefuTLkF/Voj+lPLTxFJkfDszr0No/UCfmle7HAEAvAmbhESrLtCS
> t1WtFBITZJmYC0m7BMGC2i4Mc3+H+QY=
> =nBwe
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
>


--
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: khard_0.16.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Félix Sipma-4
Sorry, I thought this had been updated!

--
Félix

signature.asc (235 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: khard_0.16.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Félix Sipma-4
In reply to this post by Sandro Tosi-6
Note that changing the address triggers a lintian warning:

W: khard source: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure Python Applications Packaging Team <[hidden email]>

--
Félix

signature.asc (235 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: khard_0.16.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Scott Kitterman-5
On Thursday, April 23, 2020 1:06:42 PM EDT Félix Sipma wrote:
> Note that changing the address triggers a lintian warning:
>
> W: khard source: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure Python
> Applications Packaging Team <[hidden email]>

Python Applications Packaging Team <[hidden email]>
is correct.

Scott K


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning

Rebecca N. Palmer-2
In reply to this post by Félix Sipma-4
This warning was added to Lintian today, after being requested in
#958182.  It appears on thousands of packages:
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure.html

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning

Scott Kitterman-5
On Thursday, April 23, 2020 5:21:49 PM EDT Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> This warning was added to Lintian today, after being requested in
> #958182.  It appears on thousands of packages:
> https://lintian.debian.org/tags/mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructu
> re.html

Thanks.  I mailed the bug to point out this tag is currently problematic.

Scott K


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning

Louis-Philippe Véronneau-3
On 20-04-23 17 h 54, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, April 23, 2020 5:21:49 PM EDT Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
>> This warning was added to Lintian today, after being requested in
>> #958182.  It appears on thousands of packages:
>> https://lintian.debian.org/tags/mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructu
>> re.html
>
> Thanks.  I mailed the bug to point out this tag is currently problematic.

FWIW, I proposed we merge the DPMT and the PAPT a few months ago [1] and
migrate to [hidden email].

That would also solve the current issue with lintian :)

[1]:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/-/merge_requests/10

--
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   [hidden email] / veronneau.org
  ⠈⠳⣄


signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning

Scott Kitterman-5


On April 24, 2020 12:26:27 AM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>On 20-04-23 17 h 54, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> On Thursday, April 23, 2020 5:21:49 PM EDT Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
>>> This warning was added to Lintian today, after being requested in
>>> #958182.  It appears on thousands of packages:
>>>
>https://lintian.debian.org/tags/mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructu
>>> re.html
>>
>> Thanks.  I mailed the bug to point out this tag is currently
>problematic.
>
>FWIW, I proposed we merge the DPMT and the PAPT a few months ago [1]
>and
>migrate to [hidden email].
>
>That would also solve the current issue with lintian :)
>
>[1]:
>https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/-/merge_requests/10

And I don't think the response was particularly positive.  My recollection was that there's a preference for two teams because packages and modules have different needs.

I don't think we should let an artificial sense of urgency because lintian push us in to anything (apologies if I'm remembering the wrong instance of this being suggested - it's happened before).

Scott K

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning

Louis-Philippe Véronneau-3
On 20-04-23 20 h 52, Scott Kitterman wrote:

>
>
> On April 24, 2020 12:26:27 AM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> On 20-04-23 17 h 54, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> On Thursday, April 23, 2020 5:21:49 PM EDT Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
>>>> This warning was added to Lintian today, after being requested in
>>>> #958182.  It appears on thousands of packages:
>>>>
>> https://lintian.debian.org/tags/mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructu
>>>> re.html
>>>
>>> Thanks.  I mailed the bug to point out this tag is currently
>> problematic.
>>
>> FWIW, I proposed we merge the DPMT and the PAPT a few months ago [1]
>> and
>> migrate to [hidden email].
>>
>> That would also solve the current issue with lintian :)
>>
>> [1]:
>> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/-/merge_requests/10
>
> And I don't think the response was particularly positive.  My recollection was that there's a preference for two teams because packages and modules have different needs.
Hmm, from the discussions we had on the mailing list and on Salsa the
feedback was mainly positive actually.

Happy to talk some more about it either on Salsa or on the ML:

https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/10/msg00021.html

>
> I don't think we should let an artificial sense of urgency because lintian push us in to anything (apologies if I'm remembering the wrong instance of this being suggested - it's happened before).

Agreed :)

Sorry for disrupting this thread.

--
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   [hidden email] / veronneau.org
  ⠈⠳⣄


signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment