On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:39:45AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> Here's the current status of the woody builds:
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelWoodyUpdateStatus >
> This should put all the woody kernels on par with Joey's
> kernel-source-2.4.18 (2.4.18-14.4).
> Any testing you can do would be greatly appreciated; that's the biggest
> hole right now.
> Can anyone help out with the mips build? I don't have a working mips
BTW, for the apus woody kernel, i believe none really uses them, or maybe 3
persons or so, and i doubt you will get any tester.
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 20:26 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Thursday 22 December 2005 18:39, dann frazier wrote:
> > Here's the current status of the woody builds:
> > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelWoodyUpdateStatus >
> I could install and boot the kernel from
> kernel-image-2.4.18-1-686_2.4.18-13.2_i386.deb without problems. (On a
> Celeron (Coppermine) running woody...)
> The only problem I have encountered, that I didn't have a
> kernel-image-2.4.18-1-686 package, but only a kernel-image-2.4.18-686 ?!
> The wiki-page is updated.
>From what I understand, kernel-image-2.4.18-1-* supersedes the other
package. In other words, kernel-image-2.4.18-1-686 is a source package
replacement for kernel-image-2.4.18-686. At least, the latter is the
only one that was getting security patches.
Can anyone confirm this for sure?
btw, I've tested one of the ia64 flavors & it was fine too - wiki
updated to reflect this.